Gswiki talk:Style guide: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
VANKRASN39 (talk | contribs) m (update) |
(Category/section style?) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:I have removed the H from IUHPOV so that articles are officially acceptable in present tense if something still exists, like Wehnimer's Landing. Thanks to Scribes for his input. [[User:VANKRASN39|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39|talk]]) 13:45, 15 June 2015 (CDT) |
:I have removed the H from IUHPOV so that articles are officially acceptable in present tense if something still exists, like Wehnimer's Landing. Thanks to Scribes for his input. [[User:VANKRASN39|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39|talk]]) 13:45, 15 June 2015 (CDT) |
||
It would be good to have a guideline for whether category and article section headings should use the same style as article titles. Personally I feel it would be more consistent that way going forward as it matches native wiki style better (though it's not necessary to retroactively change existing categories, which are split half and half at the moment). [[User:ZHOUY1|ZHOUY1]] ([[User talk:ZHOUY1|talk]]) 16:14, 19 August 2015 (CDT) |
|||
Revision as of 16:14, 19 August 2015
Has anything been decided on this? I think most current editors prefer writing things that are current in current tense. VANKRASN39 (talk) 11:26, 8 January 2015 (CST)
- I have removed the H from IUHPOV so that articles are officially acceptable in present tense if something still exists, like Wehnimer's Landing. Thanks to Scribes for his input. VANKRASN39 (talk) 13:45, 15 June 2015 (CDT)
It would be good to have a guideline for whether category and article section headings should use the same style as article titles. Personally I feel it would be more consistent that way going forward as it matches native wiki style better (though it's not necessary to retroactively change existing categories, which are split half and half at the moment). ZHOUY1 (talk) 16:14, 19 August 2015 (CDT)