Talk:Damage cycle: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "I disagree that the 62hp instance in the clip shown is a 'damage cycle' per se; that appears to be the base damage inflicted by the spell's effect. However, I am perfectly wi...") |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 10:36, 27 November 2017
I disagree that the 62hp instance in the clip shown is a 'damage cycle' per se; that appears to be the base damage inflicted by the spell's effect. However, I am perfectly willing to agree that the lower two sets of messaging ARE 'damage cycle's. Should the "<-" indicator be removed from that first one? KRAKII (talk) 09:36, 27 November 2017 (CST)