Talk:Faendryl Socio-Political Structure: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
VANKRASN39 (talk | contribs) m (how to sign comments) |
VANKRASN39 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
No reason to delete the original version. It still contains concepts players can use. |
No reason to delete the original version. It still contains concepts players can use. |
||
:Please sign your comments with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. With the conflicting versions and issues that some players are having with NPCs, I think the official version should be revised rather than having a competing version. I will not be formatting this document or linking to it. I will leave the decision to delete it to Scribes or other similarly wiki aware GM. Let's have one document, not two. [[User:VANKRASN39|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39|talk]]) 14:40, 14 June 2015 (CDT) |
:Please sign your comments with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. With the conflicting versions and issues that some players are having with NPCs, I think the official version should be revised rather than having a competing version. I will not be formatting this document or linking to it. I will leave the decision to delete it to Scribes or other similarly wiki aware GM. Let's have one document, not two. If you want it up because there are sections that aren't referred to at all in the official document, those sections should have their own pages and a disclaimer. [[User:VANKRASN39|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39|talk]]) 14:40, 14 June 2015 (CDT) |
||
Revision as of 15:01, 14 June 2015
No reason to delete the original version. It still contains concepts players can use.
- Please sign your comments with ~~~~. With the conflicting versions and issues that some players are having with NPCs, I think the official version should be revised rather than having a competing version. I will not be formatting this document or linking to it. I will leave the decision to delete it to Scribes or other similarly wiki aware GM. Let's have one document, not two. If you want it up because there are sections that aren't referred to at all in the official document, those sections should have their own pages and a disclaimer. VANKRASN39 (talk) 14:40, 14 June 2015 (CDT)