Talk:History of Cavernhold: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
CLUNK24963 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
CLUNK24963 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:What do you mean? What is needed outside of standard hyperlinks? Approved way? [[User:VANKRASN39|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39|talk]]) 08:44, 17 February 2015 (CST) |
:What do you mean? What is needed outside of standard hyperlinks? Approved way? [[User:VANKRASN39|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39|talk]]) 08:44, 17 February 2015 (CST) |
||
Back in history, I recall that Simutronics had a specific picture to use as a link for directing readers to play.net. When the |
Back in history, I recall that Simutronics had a specific picture to use as a link for directing readers to play.net. When the folks at Simutronics 'approved' an article, then the webpage author could add the gif/html combination in ther article to direct folks to play.net. Is that still a procedure they use, or are the links I have now ok? They've been there for years because I never could figure out what steps to take next ... CLUNK24963 18:32, 26 February 2015 (CST) |
||
Revision as of 19:33, 26 February 2015
Do we have a guide on an approved way to lead folks to Gemstone and play.net from external articles? --CLUNK24963 06:29, 17 February 2015 (CST)
- What do you mean? What is needed outside of standard hyperlinks? Approved way? VANKRASN39 (talk) 08:44, 17 February 2015 (CST)
Back in history, I recall that Simutronics had a specific picture to use as a link for directing readers to play.net. When the folks at Simutronics 'approved' an article, then the webpage author could add the gif/html combination in ther article to direct folks to play.net. Is that still a procedure they use, or are the links I have now ok? They've been there for years because I never could figure out what steps to take next ... CLUNK24963 18:32, 26 February 2015 (CST)