Talk:Research:Open ambushing: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
VANKRASN39 (talk | contribs) m (VANKRASN39 moved page Talk:Open ambushing guide to Talk:Research:Open ambushing: new research prefix) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:I'm going to take a crack at improving this, though I'm not the most knowledgeable person in Elanthia with open ambushing, so hopefully others will hop in once I get a decent structure going for it. [[User:OM1E5GA|OM1E5GA]] ([[User talk:OM1E5GA|talk]]) 17:37, 6 July 2017 (CDT) |
:I'm going to take a crack at improving this, though I'm not the most knowledgeable person in Elanthia with open ambushing, so hopefully others will hop in once I get a decent structure going for it. [[User:OM1E5GA|OM1E5GA]] ([[User talk:OM1E5GA|talk]]) 17:37, 6 July 2017 (CDT) |
||
::After doing some work on this, I discovered that the [[AMBUSH (verb)]] page already had what I was doing in essentially the same format. I saved my progress locally and will continue it if others think this is worth saving.... but I'd recommend moving useful bits that aren't already on "AMBUSH (verb)" there and deleting this page rather than having two pages that are basically the same other then some research. Alternatively, this page could be renamed "open ambushing research" and linked to as a resource from AMBUSH (verb) (since that's pretty much what it is). [[User:OM1E5GA|OM1E5GA]] ([[User talk:OM1E5GA|talk]]) 18:23, 6 July 2017 (CDT) |
|||
Latest revision as of 13:58, 7 August 2017
Is anyone able to provide a basic description of open ambushing in an appropriate article format? This article is not adequate as a guide or article. VANKRASN39 (talk) 08:42, 5 October 2016 (CDT)
- I'm going to take a crack at improving this, though I'm not the most knowledgeable person in Elanthia with open ambushing, so hopefully others will hop in once I get a decent structure going for it. OM1E5GA (talk) 17:37, 6 July 2017 (CDT)
- After doing some work on this, I discovered that the AMBUSH (verb) page already had what I was doing in essentially the same format. I saved my progress locally and will continue it if others think this is worth saving.... but I'd recommend moving useful bits that aren't already on "AMBUSH (verb)" there and deleting this page rather than having two pages that are basically the same other then some research. Alternatively, this page could be renamed "open ambushing research" and linked to as a resource from AMBUSH (verb) (since that's pretty much what it is). OM1E5GA (talk) 18:23, 6 July 2017 (CDT)