Talk:Yuriqen: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:::Its a new style that KP is adopting. Naturally, there are plenty of articles which need to be converted (headache). But once you get used to it, its not too bad. Basically just think of it as you're an IC historian writing about Elanthia so many years into the future. [[User:REBELAT|Rail]] 22:18, 6 November 2006 (EST) |
:::Its a new style that KP is adopting. Naturally, there are plenty of articles which need to be converted (headache). But once you get used to it, its not too bad. Basically just think of it as you're an IC historian writing about Elanthia so many years into the future. [[User:REBELAT|Rail]] 22:18, 6 November 2006 (EST) |
||
::::I think it sounds bad, but Ollie's the boss. |
::::I think it sounds bad, but Ollie's the boss. [[User:WELCHA|Andreas]] 23:16, 6 November 2006 (EST) |
||
Revision as of 23:16, 6 November 2006
Okay, perhaps I've missed something here, but "was a city" means that it is no longer a city. "is a city" means that it continues to exist, which it does.... WELCHA 19:21, 6 November 2006 (EST)
- Please read the Style Guide.
- Oliver Talk 22:13, 6 November 2006 (EST)
- Its a new style that KP is adopting. Naturally, there are plenty of articles which need to be converted (headache). But once you get used to it, its not too bad. Basically just think of it as you're an IC historian writing about Elanthia so many years into the future. Rail 22:18, 6 November 2006 (EST)
- I think it sounds bad, but Ollie's the boss. Andreas 23:16, 6 November 2006 (EST)