Template talk:Arkati: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "Is there an stylistic preference against setting horizontal navigation boxes to be 100% width? Wikipedia uses 100% and I think it looks slightly better, and there's less chanc...") |
VANKRASN39 (talk | contribs) (response) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Is there an stylistic preference against setting horizontal navigation boxes to be 100% width? Wikipedia uses 100% and I think it looks slightly better, and there's less chance of unnecessary wrapping in narrower windows. [[User:ZHOUY1|ZHOUY1]] ([[User talk:ZHOUY1|talk]]) 17:39, 24 April 2015 (CDT) |
Is there an stylistic preference against setting horizontal navigation boxes to be 100% width? Wikipedia uses 100% and I think it looks slightly better, and there's less chance of unnecessary wrapping in narrower windows. [[User:ZHOUY1|ZHOUY1]] ([[User talk:ZHOUY1|talk]]) 17:39, 24 April 2015 (CDT) |
||
:I did not design the original navigation boxes, but personally I think the narrower ones look better and are spaced better, and I prefer we have our own look vs. just going with what Wikipedia does. [[User:VANKRASN39|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39|talk]]) 17:53, 24 April 2015 (CDT) |
|||
Latest revision as of 17:53, 24 April 2015
Is there an stylistic preference against setting horizontal navigation boxes to be 100% width? Wikipedia uses 100% and I think it looks slightly better, and there's less chance of unnecessary wrapping in narrower windows. ZHOUY1 (talk) 17:39, 24 April 2015 (CDT)
- I did not design the original navigation boxes, but personally I think the narrower ones look better and are spaced better, and I prefer we have our own look vs. just going with what Wikipedia does. VANKRASN39 (talk) 17:53, 24 April 2015 (CDT)