Talk:Hot Summer Nights 2015: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
VANKRASN39 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
GS4-SCRIBES (talk | contribs) (→Format) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Any opinions on going in reverse order (newest on top)? [[User:VANKRASN39|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39|talk]]) 11:22, 29 June 2015 (CDT) |
Any opinions on going in reverse order (newest on top)? [[User:VANKRASN39|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39|talk]]) 11:22, 29 June 2015 (CDT) |
||
:Would it be a pain to put into a table, where we can toggle between chronological and reverse chronological? That's a thought. As for a permanent reverse order, it really boils down to usage. If people are using the page to get info on the latest release, then reverse makes the best sense. If it's merely recording the releases for posterity, then I think chronological order makes sense (hence the compromise of using a table to flip back and forth). What's your thought?[[User:GS4-SCRIBES|GS4-SCRIBES]] ([[User talk:GS4-SCRIBES|talk]]) 13:23, 29 June 2015 (CDT) |
Revision as of 12:23, 29 June 2015
Format
I started a format for what I think will be a useful way to record the HSN releases. Please feel free to puzzle around better ways. Announcements could be copied/saved posts either on this page or linked to a separate HSN 2015 saved post article. GS4-SCRIBES (talk) 18:59, 21 June 2015 (CDT)
- I like short and sweet with links to applicable pages. FYI I am on vacation August 5-24 so I should not be depended on to do updates. VANKRASN39 (talk) 23:02, 23 June 2015 (CDT)
Any opinions on going in reverse order (newest on top)? VANKRASN39 (talk) 11:22, 29 June 2015 (CDT)
- Would it be a pain to put into a table, where we can toggle between chronological and reverse chronological? That's a thought. As for a permanent reverse order, it really boils down to usage. If people are using the page to get info on the latest release, then reverse makes the best sense. If it's merely recording the releases for posterity, then I think chronological order makes sense (hence the compromise of using a table to flip back and forth). What's your thought?GS4-SCRIBES (talk) 13:23, 29 June 2015 (CDT)