Talk:Magic Item Use: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Raise Dead and Lores: new section) |
|||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I just deleted the parenthetical clause: ([[Raise Dead (318)]] is an exception and does not require additional training) from the Lores section. In context, it said that while normally it takes 3 ranks of lore to count as a single lore rank when using a magic item from a profession spell circle like [[Cleric Base]], Raise Dad is exempt from that rule. Except... I don't think Raise Dead is affected at all by lores. Someone help me out here. [[User:PFLATS|PFLATS]] ([[User talk:PFLATS|talk]]) 14:45, 12 August 2016 (CDT) |
I just deleted the parenthetical clause: ([[Raise Dead (318)]] is an exception and does not require additional training) from the Lores section. In context, it said that while normally it takes 3 ranks of lore to count as a single lore rank when using a magic item from a profession spell circle like [[Cleric Base]], Raise Dad is exempt from that rule. Except... I don't think Raise Dead is affected at all by lores. Someone help me out here. [[User:PFLATS|PFLATS]] ([[User talk:PFLATS|talk]]) 14:45, 12 August 2016 (CDT) |
||
:I just saw my typo, and I'm keeping it in on principle. GMs, please implement 320 as Raise Dad. [[User:PFLATS|PFLATS]] ([[User talk:PFLATS|talk]]) 14:47, 12 August 2016 (CDT) |
Revision as of 13:47, 12 August 2016
Raise Dead and Lores
I just deleted the parenthetical clause: (Raise Dead (318) is an exception and does not require additional training) from the Lores section. In context, it said that while normally it takes 3 ranks of lore to count as a single lore rank when using a magic item from a profession spell circle like Cleric Base, Raise Dad is exempt from that rule. Except... I don't think Raise Dead is affected at all by lores. Someone help me out here. PFLATS (talk) 14:45, 12 August 2016 (CDT)