Talk:Padding: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
VANKRASN39 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
VANKRASN39 (talk | contribs) (add link to post) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==Removed Player Research== |
==Removed Player Research== |
||
"GILCHRISTR's research indicates that 1 potential phantom damage is removed for each 4 bonus." This is not correct per GM Estild. [[User:VANKRASN39|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39|talk]]) 19:42, 30 May 2017 (CDT) |
"GILCHRISTR's research indicates that 1 potential phantom damage is removed for each 4 bonus." This is not correct per [http://forums.play.net/forums/GemStone%20IV/Hunting%20and%20Combat/Weighting%20and%20Padding/view/36 GM Estild]. [[User:VANKRASN39|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39|talk]]) 19:42, 30 May 2017 (CDT) |
||
Revision as of 18:47, 30 May 2017
The resistances offered by 620 aren't exactly 'padding'. Also, this page needs some work on its layout. - Andy talk 17:18, 18 May 2007 (EDT)
- Really not sure why it took so long to remove this section. VANKRASN39 (talk) 06:38, 24 June 2015 (CDT)
The padding/weighting numbers are finally accurate. GS4-WYROM (talk) 13:34, 10 February 2016 (CST)
Removed Player Research
"GILCHRISTR's research indicates that 1 potential phantom damage is removed for each 4 bonus." This is not correct per GM Estild. VANKRASN39 (talk) 19:42, 30 May 2017 (CDT)