Talk:ICE gods: Difference between revisions

The official GemStone IV encyclopedia.
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
I love the detailed material! However, your very first listing shows "Akalatan" in the plain-text and "Akaltan" in the copy from the Shadow World material. [[User:KRAKII|KRAKII]] ([[User talk:KRAKII|talk]]) 09:32, 17 January 2019 (CST)
I love the detailed material! However, your very first listing shows "Akalatan" in the plain-text and "Akaltan" in the copy from the Shadow World material. [[User:KRAKII|KRAKII]] ([[User talk:KRAKII|talk]]) 09:32, 17 January 2019 (CST)
:They changed the spelling between editions. It was Akaltan in the 1st edition Master Atlas Addendum (page 46) in 1990, and then Akalatan in Master Atlas 2nd edition (page 118) from 1992 onwards. [[User:INIQUITY|INIQUITY]] ([[User talk:INIQUITY|talk]]) 22:49, 4 May 2023 (CDT)


I'm going to object to pasting the current official documentation here. I don't think it's appropriate, also please see the style guide about repeated information. You're doing a great job otherwise. [[User:VANKRASN39|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39|talk]]) 01:11, 31 May 2018 (CDT)
I'm going to object to pasting the current official documentation here. I don't think it's appropriate, also please see the style guide about repeated information. You're doing a great job otherwise. [[User:VANKRASN39|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39|talk]]) 01:11, 31 May 2018 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 21:49, 4 May 2023

I love the detailed material! However, your very first listing shows "Akalatan" in the plain-text and "Akaltan" in the copy from the Shadow World material. KRAKII (talk) 09:32, 17 January 2019 (CST)

They changed the spelling between editions. It was Akaltan in the 1st edition Master Atlas Addendum (page 46) in 1990, and then Akalatan in Master Atlas 2nd edition (page 118) from 1992 onwards. INIQUITY (talk) 22:49, 4 May 2023 (CDT)

I'm going to object to pasting the current official documentation here. I don't think it's appropriate, also please see the style guide about repeated information. You're doing a great job otherwise. VANKRASN39 (talk) 01:11, 31 May 2018 (CDT)

I will just replace those "modern" sections by only including the links like I have for the "later developments." It is looking like the details within this particular format have not changed in almost twenty years, but it was not obvious that was going to happen. The later documentation and history often contradicts it, or supersedes it in various ways. INIQUITY (talk) 09:53, 1 June 2018 (CDT)