Talk:Sleep (501): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(News doesn't belong in an article that isn't a news article... I'll probably correct this later.) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
News items like this should have their own articles and be merely linked from the main article. Just talk about what the spell is as it is now; we don't need a history lesson on the spell in its article. - [[User:BELATHUS|Andy]] <sup>[[User talk:BELATHUS|talk]]</sup> 23:58, 24 October 2007 (EDT) |
News items like this should have their own articles and be merely linked from the main article. Just talk about what the spell is as it is now; we don't need a history lesson on the spell in its article. - [[User:BELATHUS|Andy]] <sup>[[User talk:BELATHUS|talk]]</sup> 23:58, 24 October 2007 (EDT) |
||
Yeah, it is best to make a saved post article for the news item and then link the saved post at the bottom within the references section. Although, it doesn't hurt to mention the new facets of the spell within the actual spell article. [[User:DRIZZT-12|Adam]] <sup>[[User talk:DRIZZT-12|talk]]</sup> 00:42, 25 October 2007 (EDT) |
|||
Revision as of 22:42, 24 October 2007
News items like this should have their own articles and be merely linked from the main article. Just talk about what the spell is as it is now; we don't need a history lesson on the spell in its article. - Andy talk 23:58, 24 October 2007 (EDT)
Yeah, it is best to make a saved post article for the news item and then link the saved post at the bottom within the references section. Although, it doesn't hurt to mention the new facets of the spell within the actual spell article. Adam talk 00:42, 25 October 2007 (EDT)