Talk:Censure (316): Difference between revisions
m (1 revision: Krakiipedia Import) |
VANKRASN39 (talk | contribs) m (remove broken link) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'd like to suggest adding the deity-specific messaging to a seperate article. Something like |
I'd like to suggest adding the deity-specific messaging to a seperate article. Something like '''Censure (messaging)''' I think would be appropriate. I'd include the spell number, but I think that [[Censure (316) (messaging)]] would just be silly. Of course, just because I'm a SysOp doesn't mean my word is law -- it is nothing more than a suggestion, at this point. - [[User:BELATHUS|Andy]] <sup>[[User talk:BELATHUS|talk]]</sup> 22:17, 10 February 2007 (EST) |
||
One of my medium-term goals is to make a page for deity-specific messaging '''in general''', and the [[CONVERT (verb)]] page now should link to every page with different messaging. With [[Censure (316)]], I was following the model I'd started with [[Well of Life (308)]] - the meat of the spell first, with the deity-specific bits at the end. I can add a seperate page for it (or a subpage), but I was starting to wonder if that wasn't getting into the weeds. [[User:VT-JSARIA|Jeremy]] 23:41, 10 February 2007 (EST) |
One of my medium-term goals is to make a page for deity-specific messaging '''in general''', and the [[CONVERT (verb)]] page now should link to every page with different messaging. With [[Censure (316)]], I was following the model I'd started with [[Well of Life (308)]] - the meat of the spell first, with the deity-specific bits at the end. I can add a seperate page for it (or a subpage), but I was starting to wonder if that wasn't getting into the weeds. [[User:VT-JSARIA|Jeremy]] 23:41, 10 February 2007 (EST) |
||
Revision as of 13:51, 17 March 2015
I'd like to suggest adding the deity-specific messaging to a seperate article. Something like Censure (messaging) I think would be appropriate. I'd include the spell number, but I think that Censure (316) (messaging) would just be silly. Of course, just because I'm a SysOp doesn't mean my word is law -- it is nothing more than a suggestion, at this point. - Andy talk 22:17, 10 February 2007 (EST)
One of my medium-term goals is to make a page for deity-specific messaging in general, and the CONVERT (verb) page now should link to every page with different messaging. With Censure (316), I was following the model I'd started with Well of Life (308) - the meat of the spell first, with the deity-specific bits at the end. I can add a seperate page for it (or a subpage), but I was starting to wonder if that wasn't getting into the weeds. Jeremy 23:41, 10 February 2007 (EST)