Talk:Empath: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
m (2 revisions: Krakiipedia Import) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
While I can see the subjective content, and thanks for cleaning up my messy writing, don't you think that mention of Empath's semi-complete status should be included? Its rather important I think. [[User:IRVINETOMOE|IRVINETOMOE]] 14:14, 31 May 2006 (PDT) |
While I can see the subjective content, and thanks for cleaning up my messy writing, don't you think that mention of Empath's semi-complete status should be included? Its rather important I think. [[User:IRVINETOMOE|IRVINETOMOE]] 14:14, 31 May 2006 (PDT) |
||
: That's partially why it's subjective, really. I think that Empaths are more or less as 'complete' as any other profession we have right now. Yes, there are plans for changes to occur within the professiona at some point in the future, and it might be worthwhile to include in the article (perhaps under a "The Future of Empaths" heading somewhere) but I don't believe it's necessary to include in the opening paragraph of the article. The opening paragraph should generally aim to concisely introduce and explain, to an extent, the topic of the article. - Oliver ([[User:Anshou|User]] | [[User talk:Anshou|Talk]]) 17:38, 31 May 2006 (PDT) |
|||
:: Sounds good to me. I'll see what I can do with do with it. [[User:IRVINETOMOE|IRVINETOMOE]] 18:24, 31 May 2006 (PDT) |
|||
Latest revision as of 20:32, 31 December 2014
While I can see the subjective content, and thanks for cleaning up my messy writing, don't you think that mention of Empath's semi-complete status should be included? Its rather important I think. IRVINETOMOE 14:14, 31 May 2006 (PDT)
- That's partially why it's subjective, really. I think that Empaths are more or less as 'complete' as any other profession we have right now. Yes, there are plans for changes to occur within the professiona at some point in the future, and it might be worthwhile to include in the article (perhaps under a "The Future of Empaths" heading somewhere) but I don't believe it's necessary to include in the opening paragraph of the article. The opening paragraph should generally aim to concisely introduce and explain, to an extent, the topic of the article. - Oliver (User | Talk) 17:38, 31 May 2006 (PDT)
- Sounds good to me. I'll see what I can do with do with it. IRVINETOMOE 18:24, 31 May 2006 (PDT)