Talk:Faendryl Socio-Political Structure: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
VANKRASN39 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
GS4-SCRIBES (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
No reason to delete the original version. It still contains concepts players can use. |
No reason to delete the original version. It still contains concepts players can use. |
||
:Please sign your comments with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. With the conflicting versions and issues that some players are having with NPCs, I think the official version should be revised rather than having a competing version. I will not be formatting this document or linking to it. I will leave the decision to delete it to Scribes or other similarly wiki aware GM. Let's have one document, not two. If you want it up because there are sections that aren't referred to at all in the official document, those sections should have their own pages and a disclaimer. [[User:VANKRASN39|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39|talk]]) 14:40, 14 June 2015 (CDT) |
:Please sign your comments with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. With the conflicting versions and issues that some players are having with NPCs, I think the official version should be revised rather than having a competing version. I will not be formatting this document or linking to it. I will leave the decision to delete it to Scribes or other similarly wiki aware GM. Let's have one document, not two. If you want it up because there are sections that aren't referred to at all in the official document, those sections should have their own pages and a disclaimer. [[User:VANKRASN39|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39|talk]]) 14:40, 14 June 2015 (CDT) |
||
::Having both versions up is confusing, specifically because of the overlap. It gives the appearance of being a rough draft, which it ultimately was. If you want to put up an article that's identified as a player work discussing the topics not addressed in the official final version, that should probably be fine. For example, see [[A Treatise on Faendryl Historiography]]. So you could write a player essay that talks about the possibility of a crystal computer, but it's important to make it identifiable as a player work, not something with material endorsed by the present Dark Elf guru as canon.[[User:GS4-SCRIBES|GS4-SCRIBES]] ([[User talk:GS4-SCRIBES|talk]]) 15:43, 14 June 2015 (CDT) |
|||
Revision as of 15:43, 14 June 2015
No reason to delete the original version. It still contains concepts players can use.
- Please sign your comments with ~~~~. With the conflicting versions and issues that some players are having with NPCs, I think the official version should be revised rather than having a competing version. I will not be formatting this document or linking to it. I will leave the decision to delete it to Scribes or other similarly wiki aware GM. Let's have one document, not two. If you want it up because there are sections that aren't referred to at all in the official document, those sections should have their own pages and a disclaimer. VANKRASN39 (talk) 14:40, 14 June 2015 (CDT)
- Having both versions up is confusing, specifically because of the overlap. It gives the appearance of being a rough draft, which it ultimately was. If you want to put up an article that's identified as a player work discussing the topics not addressed in the official final version, that should probably be fine. For example, see A Treatise on Faendryl Historiography. So you could write a player essay that talks about the possibility of a crystal computer, but it's important to make it identifiable as a player work, not something with material endorsed by the present Dark Elf guru as canon.GS4-SCRIBES (talk) 15:43, 14 June 2015 (CDT)