Talk:Padding: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
VANKRASN39 (talk | contribs) (move incorrect statement to discussion) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Really not sure why it took so long to remove this section. [[User:VANKRASN39|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39|talk]]) 06:38, 24 June 2015 (CDT) |
:Really not sure why it took so long to remove this section. [[User:VANKRASN39|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39|talk]]) 06:38, 24 June 2015 (CDT) |
||
The padding/weighting numbers are finally accurate. [[User:GS4-WYROM|GS4-WYROM]] ([[User talk:GS4-WYROM|talk]]) 13:34, 10 February 2016 (CST) |
The padding/weighting numbers are finally accurate. [[User:GS4-WYROM|GS4-WYROM]] ([[User talk:GS4-WYROM|talk]]) 13:34, 10 February 2016 (CST) |
||
==Removed Player Research== |
|||
"GILCHRISTR's research indicates that 1 potential phantom damage is removed for each 4 bonus." This is not correct per GM Estild. |
|||
Revision as of 19:42, 30 May 2017
The resistances offered by 620 aren't exactly 'padding'. Also, this page needs some work on its layout. - Andy talk 17:18, 18 May 2007 (EDT)
- Really not sure why it took so long to remove this section. VANKRASN39 (talk) 06:38, 24 June 2015 (CDT)
The padding/weighting numbers are finally accurate. GS4-WYROM (talk) 13:34, 10 February 2016 (CST)
Removed Player Research
"GILCHRISTR's research indicates that 1 potential phantom damage is removed for each 4 bonus." This is not correct per GM Estild.