Talk:Enchant (925): Difference between revisions
(Starting a tidbits collection.) |
(→Gem-eating runestaff: new section) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Estild 8/31/2019 at 11:12 PM (on #mechanics) |
Estild 8/31/2019 at 11:12 PM (on #mechanics) |
||
It's the former, Kragdruk. diffculty(dmg CER) + difficulty(crit CER) |
It's the former, Kragdruk. diffculty(dmg CER) + difficulty(crit CER) |
||
== Gem-eating runestaff == |
|||
The gem-eating runestaff doesn't give any indication that it's not enchantable under the new system. It does appear to be a high level of difficulty; in a workshop, with enhancives, and a wizard that has 127 wizard ranks post-cap, the best possible outcome was: You sense that the lor runestaff bears a natural enchantment and that you are more likely than not to succeed on your enchantment, but you will need some luck. |
|||
Comparatively, veil iron - a metal known not to be enchantable - gives the message "seems to resist your magic!". |
|||
Does anyone have any data that would contradict with removing this item from the "Not enchantable" table? |
|||
Revision as of 17:37, 16 October 2019
Tidbits discovered and / or GM confirmed:
From Discord - a brief exchange on enchanting difficulties for armor with both crit and dmg padding
Estild 8/31/2019 at 11:12 PM (on #mechanics) It's the former, Kragdruk. diffculty(dmg CER) + difficulty(crit CER)
Gem-eating runestaff
The gem-eating runestaff doesn't give any indication that it's not enchantable under the new system. It does appear to be a high level of difficulty; in a workshop, with enhancives, and a wizard that has 127 wizard ranks post-cap, the best possible outcome was: You sense that the lor runestaff bears a natural enchantment and that you are more likely than not to succeed on your enchantment, but you will need some luck.
Comparatively, veil iron - a metal known not to be enchantable - gives the message "seems to resist your magic!".
Does anyone have any data that would contradict with removing this item from the "Not enchantable" table?