Talk:Invisibility (916): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Mass spells: new section) |
|||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
In my recent experience, mass spells do not break invisibility. Has this changed? |
In my recent experience, mass spells do not break invisibility. Has this changed? |
||
:Could you be a bit more specific -- are you asking about the caster or receiver(s), and is there a particular situation you're running into that brought the question up? [[User:GS4-KAIKALA|GS4-KAIKALA]] ([[User talk:GS4-KAIKALA|talk]]) 00:39, 15 December 2016 (CST) |
|||
:My apologies, I couldn't have been more vague! Invisibility page, paragraph two, final line: "Most defensive spells will not break invisibility '''but mass spells (e.g. Mass Blur, Mass Elemental Defense) will,''' unless the caster is not in a group." I've found this to be untrue but wanted to verify before I changed it.--[[User:ECHEAUX|ECHEAUX]] ([[User talk:ECHEAUX|talk]]) 07:55, 17 December 2016 (CST) |
Latest revision as of 07:55, 17 December 2016
Mass spells
In my recent experience, mass spells do not break invisibility. Has this changed?
- Could you be a bit more specific -- are you asking about the caster or receiver(s), and is there a particular situation you're running into that brought the question up? GS4-KAIKALA (talk) 00:39, 15 December 2016 (CST)
- My apologies, I couldn't have been more vague! Invisibility page, paragraph two, final line: "Most defensive spells will not break invisibility but mass spells (e.g. Mass Blur, Mass Elemental Defense) will, unless the caster is not in a group." I've found this to be untrue but wanted to verify before I changed it.--ECHEAUX (talk) 07:55, 17 December 2016 (CST)