Talk:Enhancement: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
VANKRASN39 (talk | contribs) (ideas of what to do with this page. the contents are redundant/not up to snuff) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:: If you're saying that [[damage weighting]] and [[critical weighting]] should be on one page, I disagree. They are unique enough in their own right to deserve individual pages, and its important to differentiate between the two. If you're saying there should be a main [[weighting]] page (similar to [[padding]]), which explains in general and links to each individual article, then carry on. *SammichKing*..[[User:ULTHRIPE|who?]]..[[User talk:ULTHRIPE|wha?]] 22:46, 2 April 2006 (PDT) |
:: If you're saying that [[damage weighting]] and [[critical weighting]] should be on one page, I disagree. They are unique enough in their own right to deserve individual pages, and its important to differentiate between the two. If you're saying there should be a main [[weighting]] page (similar to [[padding]]), which explains in general and links to each individual article, then carry on. *SammichKing*..[[User:ULTHRIPE|who?]]..[[User talk:ULTHRIPE|wha?]] 22:46, 2 April 2006 (PDT) |
||
==Page Needed?== |
|||
This page seems redundant with all of the item and service information that has been added to the wiki since 2012. It also hasn't been touched since 2006. One idea is to redirect it to [[item properties]] and put the otheruses template on that page. Other ideas welcome. [[User:VANKRASN39|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39|talk]]) 13:38, 15 September 2017 (CDT) |
|||
Latest revision as of 12:38, 15 September 2017
Just to let you know, there's an article at Padded that covers several types. You might want to either split it or somehow figure out how to make it work. It also probably should be named Padding (which is currently a redirect to it), but that's another issue. - Ildran 10:21, 2 April 2006 (PDT)
- Yes, I noticed that. I suppose it wouldn't hurt to combine the Critical and Damage weighting articles, either. Redirecting them all to their base articles would likely be the best option. -Belathus 10:27, 2 April 2006 (PDT)
- If you're saying that damage weighting and critical weighting should be on one page, I disagree. They are unique enough in their own right to deserve individual pages, and its important to differentiate between the two. If you're saying there should be a main weighting page (similar to padding), which explains in general and links to each individual article, then carry on. *SammichKing*..who?..wha? 22:46, 2 April 2006 (PDT)
Page Needed?
This page seems redundant with all of the item and service information that has been added to the wiki since 2012. It also hasn't been touched since 2006. One idea is to redirect it to item properties and put the otheruses template on that page. Other ideas welcome. VANKRASN39 (talk) 13:38, 15 September 2017 (CDT)