Talk:Verb:TATTOO: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "As written, the benefit from Mana Control is really big if someone has a lot of Mental/just one Spirit, tending downwards the more Spirit one has, until "fully singled in both...") |
MOD-GSMOTTE (talk | contribs) m (MOD-GSMOTTE moved page Talk:TATTOO (verb) to Talk:Verb:TATTOO: Moving this page per https://gswiki.play.net/Help:Verb_pages#Article_Title) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Is there really a reason to have to stock tattoos listed both on this page and [[Stock tattoo]]s? The list is identical. I think we should make a template for stock tattoos and transclude it to both these pages. [[User:DAID|DAID]] ([[User talk:DAID|talk]]) 03:23, 17 October 2021 (CDT) |
|||
---- |
|||
As written, the benefit from Mana Control is really big if someone has a lot of Mental/just one Spirit, tending downwards the more Spirit one has, until "fully singled in both" provides a bonus of exactly 1. Having 0 ranks of MC:Spirit causes a divide-by-zero error, yielding no bonus. |
As written, the benefit from Mana Control is really big if someone has a lot of Mental/just one Spirit, tending downwards the more Spirit one has, until "fully singled in both" provides a bonus of exactly 1. Having 0 ranks of MC:Spirit causes a divide-by-zero error, yielding no bonus. |
||
Latest revision as of 09:53, 2 July 2023
Is there really a reason to have to stock tattoos listed both on this page and Stock tattoos? The list is identical. I think we should make a template for stock tattoos and transclude it to both these pages. DAID (talk) 03:23, 17 October 2021 (CDT)
As written, the benefit from Mana Control is really big if someone has a lot of Mental/just one Spirit, tending downwards the more Spirit one has, until "fully singled in both" provides a bonus of exactly 1. Having 0 ranks of MC:Spirit causes a divide-by-zero error, yielding no bonus.
My supposition is that those may be intended to be "plus sum of ranks", but clarification would be good.
Also, should the use of ML:Transformation (self-applied) or ML:Telepathy (other-applied) be spelled out here, or force the researcher to go read the Saved Post linked at the bottom? KRAKII (talk) 11:23, 12 July 2020 (CDT)