Template talk:Creature treasure: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
SPYRIDONM1 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Anyone with a slightly better grasp of templates give me some feedback on this? It doesn't look like its having any conflicts on the pre-existing pages. I tested updating [[Dhu goleras]], and it looks fine. I'll roll it back if necessary, but I think it needs to be expanded a little, its too vague right now. [[User:IRVINETOMOE|IRVINETOMOE]] 16:27, 27 January 2013 (EST) |
Anyone with a slightly better grasp of templates give me some feedback on this? It doesn't look like its having any conflicts on the pre-existing pages. I tested updating [[Dhu goleras]], and it looks fine. I'll roll it back if necessary, but I think it needs to be expanded a little, its too vague right now. [[User:IRVINETOMOE|IRVINETOMOE]] 16:27, 27 January 2013 (EST) |
||
:Are you going to update every creature page manually? Removing 'Types' from the template removes previously posted treasure data from being displayed. If you go to -->ghostly pooka-->edit you'll see Type = gems, boxes. That info is no longer displayed and will have to be updated manually. [[User:SPYRIDONM1|Mark]] 22:49, 27 January 2013 (EST) |
:Are you going to update every creature page manually? Removing 'Types' from the template removes previously posted treasure data from being displayed. If you go to -->ghostly pooka-->edit you'll see Type = gems, boxes. That info is no longer displayed and will have to be updated manually. [[User:SPYRIDONM1|Mark]] 22:49, 27 January 2013 (EST) |
||
::I don't really see an alternative. The creature treasure section is so underdeveloped as it is, I don't think it will be that daunting a task anyway . . . it was trying to start adding to that which led me to this attempt at reorganizing it anyway. I have some additional concepts I might try to incorporate as well, such as a Gem category ([[Dhu goleras]], for instance, would have a link to Elven Nation gems). Rather than put just Yes in the Gem field, you would put something like Yes (EN) which would link to that page. Do you have any suggestions or improvements, before I go do a massive sweeping change of 50 some creature articles? [[User:IRVINETOMOE|IRVINETOMOE]] 06:20, 28 January 2013 (EST) |
|||
Revision as of 05:20, 28 January 2013
Anyone with a slightly better grasp of templates give me some feedback on this? It doesn't look like its having any conflicts on the pre-existing pages. I tested updating Dhu goleras, and it looks fine. I'll roll it back if necessary, but I think it needs to be expanded a little, its too vague right now. IRVINETOMOE 16:27, 27 January 2013 (EST)
- Are you going to update every creature page manually? Removing 'Types' from the template removes previously posted treasure data from being displayed. If you go to -->ghostly pooka-->edit you'll see Type = gems, boxes. That info is no longer displayed and will have to be updated manually. Mark 22:49, 27 January 2013 (EST)
- I don't really see an alternative. The creature treasure section is so underdeveloped as it is, I don't think it will be that daunting a task anyway . . . it was trying to start adding to that which led me to this attempt at reorganizing it anyway. I have some additional concepts I might try to incorporate as well, such as a Gem category (Dhu goleras, for instance, would have a link to Elven Nation gems). Rather than put just Yes in the Gem field, you would put something like Yes (EN) which would link to that page. Do you have any suggestions or improvements, before I go do a massive sweeping change of 50 some creature articles? IRVINETOMOE 06:20, 28 January 2013 (EST)