Talk:Adventurer's Guild: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
m (fine) |
||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
:You're right, Justin. This is going to be a ginormous table, eventually, but I still see the use of the data. However, in order to prevent it from taking up the entire talk page, I went ahead and aligned it to the right. In any case... about the ruby/star ruby thing, you're right. There is a huge difference between rubies and star rubies, however, they do share the same noun, and as with all gems, the articles are going to be named after the noun, and not the specific gem, like with the [[sapphire]], [[gem]], and [[opal]] pages. Even gems with unique nouns (like the [[Selanthan bloodjewel]]) will redirect to their base noun ([[Bloodjewel]]). -[[User:BELATHUS|Andy]] <sup>[[User talk:BELATHUS|talk]]</sup> 13:18, 14 August 2006 (EDT) |
:You're right, Justin. This is going to be a ginormous table, eventually, but I still see the use of the data. However, in order to prevent it from taking up the entire talk page, I went ahead and aligned it to the right. In any case... about the ruby/star ruby thing, you're right. There is a huge difference between rubies and star rubies, however, they do share the same noun, and as with all gems, the articles are going to be named after the noun, and not the specific gem, like with the [[sapphire]], [[gem]], and [[opal]] pages. Even gems with unique nouns (like the [[Selanthan bloodjewel]]) will redirect to their base noun ([[Bloodjewel]]). -[[User:BELATHUS|Andy]] <sup>[[User talk:BELATHUS|talk]]</sup> 13:18, 14 August 2006 (EDT) |
||
Oh, ok. fantastic. Since I've got what looks to be a slow work day ahead of me, I'll go ahead and see what I can come up with. Oh, also, I'll take the number out, since it's totally irrelevant if we're putting down silver per gem and then the bounty points (which is independent of quantity, too). [[User:ALKALOIDS|justin]] <sup>[[User talk:ALKALOIDS|talk]]</sup> 14:04, 14 August 2006 (EDT) |
|||
== Things that need to be done == |
== Things that need to be done == |
||
Revision as of 12:04, 14 August 2006
Bounty Points by Gem Type
Perhaps this table can get added to this page (or one of its own) when it fills out a bit more? who is Ulthripe reads this 03:51, 14 August 2006 (EDT)
Bounty Rewards for the Gem Gathering Task
| Gem type | Number of Gems |
Bounty Points Received |
Silver Per Gem |
|---|---|---|---|
| emerald | 5 | 1250 | 1250 |
| star ruby | 6 | 850 | 300 |
| yellow zircon | 8 | 450 | 25 |
- I suggest recording just how many gems you've collected for these tasks. Since I know these figures, I went ahead and added them, though it looks to me like the bounty points recieved is independant of the number of gems required. -Andy talk 04:44, 14 August 2006 (EDT)
Yes, it is independent of the number of gems, and so is just going to wind up being a retardedly long (and not particularly meaningful [in my opinion] table). I'll add what i have to it if really you guys think that it's important. I mean, Andy knows how many gem types there are, and yeah. Unless this was totally exhaustive, I don't see it being that useful. Also whoever was doing that table knows that this entry |[[ruby|star ruby]] is pretty silly as clearly there's a ginormous difference between rubies and star rubies (even though neither really links to a real page yet). Oh well, just my $0.02. justin talk 10:59, 14 August 2006 (EDT)
- You're right, Justin. This is going to be a ginormous table, eventually, but I still see the use of the data. However, in order to prevent it from taking up the entire talk page, I went ahead and aligned it to the right. In any case... about the ruby/star ruby thing, you're right. There is a huge difference between rubies and star rubies, however, they do share the same noun, and as with all gems, the articles are going to be named after the noun, and not the specific gem, like with the sapphire, gem, and opal pages. Even gems with unique nouns (like the Selanthan bloodjewel) will redirect to their base noun (Bloodjewel). -Andy talk 13:18, 14 August 2006 (EDT)
Oh, ok. fantastic. Since I've got what looks to be a slow work day ahead of me, I'll go ahead and see what I can come up with. Oh, also, I'll take the number out, since it's totally irrelevant if we're putting down silver per gem and then the bounty points (which is independent of quantity, too). justin talk 14:04, 14 August 2006 (EDT)
Things that need to be done
- put this in a category
- discuss faraway tasks
- declare this to be AdG unequivocally
so what do you think? category suggestions? should we list a range of rewards for a given task or an average? justin talk 19:39, 12 July 2006 (EDT)