Category talk:Official Documentation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
GS4-SCRIBES (talk | contribs) (Created page with "== Dividing the Docs == Yo, yo. I'm almost done shifting over the documents that pertain to history and race (more than 75% if not higher), but I do plan to start pulling ov...") |
VANKRASN39 (talk | contribs) (response) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Yo, yo. I'm almost done shifting over the documents that pertain to history and race (more than 75% if not higher), but I do plan to start pulling over the documents that have to do more with the mechanics and technical stuffs of the game. Along those lines, I think it could be beneficial if we could keep these two groups of documents separated. Two thoughts: A) Create a similar banner template, but one that sorts them into a skills/mechanics category, or B) create two sub categories. Thoughts? [[User:GS4-SCRIBES|GS4-SCRIBES]] ([[User talk:GS4-SCRIBES|talk]]) 16:42, 18 June 2015 (CDT) |
Yo, yo. I'm almost done shifting over the documents that pertain to history and race (more than 75% if not higher), but I do plan to start pulling over the documents that have to do more with the mechanics and technical stuffs of the game. Along those lines, I think it could be beneficial if we could keep these two groups of documents separated. Two thoughts: A) Create a similar banner template, but one that sorts them into a skills/mechanics category, or B) create two sub categories. Thoughts? [[User:GS4-SCRIBES|GS4-SCRIBES]] ([[User talk:GS4-SCRIBES|talk]]) 16:42, 18 June 2015 (CDT) |
||
:First question: are the contents of these pages going to be updated? See [[Talk:Hybrid_profession]] for a discussion and example of a page that is lacking. I'm not versed at all in old Rolemaster books or D&D, but I'm sure there are many players like Iniquity who are and I can say I'm enjoying my ignorance in that matter. Many of the lore mechanics have also been posted by Estild on the Officials that are not in the official spell description. I'm liking option A more. Maybe call it "Official Mechanics" or "Play.net Technical Pages?" I'm also not really sure of the scope. Is [http://www.play.net/gs4/info/npg/adventuring.asp this page] coming? It doesn't seem necessary at all at this point. Might take a few days for me to respond to anything. [[User:VANKRASN39|VANKRASN39]] ([[User talk:VANKRASN39|talk]]) 23:24, 19 June 2015 (CDT) |
|||
Revision as of 22:24, 19 June 2015
Dividing the Docs
Yo, yo. I'm almost done shifting over the documents that pertain to history and race (more than 75% if not higher), but I do plan to start pulling over the documents that have to do more with the mechanics and technical stuffs of the game. Along those lines, I think it could be beneficial if we could keep these two groups of documents separated. Two thoughts: A) Create a similar banner template, but one that sorts them into a skills/mechanics category, or B) create two sub categories. Thoughts? GS4-SCRIBES (talk) 16:42, 18 June 2015 (CDT)
- First question: are the contents of these pages going to be updated? See Talk:Hybrid_profession for a discussion and example of a page that is lacking. I'm not versed at all in old Rolemaster books or D&D, but I'm sure there are many players like Iniquity who are and I can say I'm enjoying my ignorance in that matter. Many of the lore mechanics have also been posted by Estild on the Officials that are not in the official spell description. I'm liking option A more. Maybe call it "Official Mechanics" or "Play.net Technical Pages?" I'm also not really sure of the scope. Is this page coming? It doesn't seem necessary at all at this point. Might take a few days for me to respond to anything. VANKRASN39 (talk) 23:24, 19 June 2015 (CDT)