Talk:Invisibility (916): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
GS4-KAIKALA (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:Could you be a bit more specific -- are you asking about the caster or receiver(s), and is there a particular situation you're running into that brought the question up? [[User:GS4-KAIKALA|GS4-KAIKALA]] ([[User talk:GS4-KAIKALA|talk]]) 00:39, 15 December 2016 (CST) |
:Could you be a bit more specific -- are you asking about the caster or receiver(s), and is there a particular situation you're running into that brought the question up? [[User:GS4-KAIKALA|GS4-KAIKALA]] ([[User talk:GS4-KAIKALA|talk]]) 00:39, 15 December 2016 (CST) |
||
:My apologies, I couldn't have been more vague! Invisibility page, paragraph two, final line: "Most defensive spells will not break invisibility '''but mass spells (e.g. Mass Blur, Mass Elemental Defense) will,''' unless the caster is not in a group." I've found this to be untrue but wanted to verify before I changed it.--[[User:ECHEAUX|ECHEAUX]] ([[User talk:ECHEAUX|talk]]) 07:55, 17 December 2016 (CST) |
|||
Latest revision as of 08:55, 17 December 2016
Mass spells
In my recent experience, mass spells do not break invisibility. Has this changed?
- Could you be a bit more specific -- are you asking about the caster or receiver(s), and is there a particular situation you're running into that brought the question up? GS4-KAIKALA (talk) 00:39, 15 December 2016 (CST)
- My apologies, I couldn't have been more vague! Invisibility page, paragraph two, final line: "Most defensive spells will not break invisibility but mass spells (e.g. Mass Blur, Mass Elemental Defense) will, unless the caster is not in a group." I've found this to be untrue but wanted to verify before I changed it.--ECHEAUX (talk) 07:55, 17 December 2016 (CST)